Open Access: an Evaluation of its Impact, Obstacles, and Advancements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18485/bibliotekar.2016.58.1_2.1Keywords:
open access, scholarly publishing, self-archiving, copyright, scholarly communication, digital scholarship, open dataAbstract
Access to research results is imperative in today’s robust digital age, yet access is often prevented by publisher paywalls. Open Access (OA) is the simple idea that all research should be free for all to access, use, and build upon. This paper will focus on three critical areas of the OA landscape: its impact on scholarship and the public, the obstacles to be overcome, and its advancements. The impact of OA actions and initiatives has been difficult to quantify, but the growing number of studies on OA have shown mostly overwhelmingly positive results. Cultural norms within academia, such as the reliance on the journal Impact Factor (IF) to assess the quality of individual research articles, have impeded the progress of OA. Conversely, federal mandates and institutional policies have supported the OA movement by requiring that scholarly publications be deposited into institutional or subject repositories immediately following publication. As information professionals, library and information science (LIS) professionals have a responsibility as practitioners, authors, and editors to support OA and encourage other academics to do the same.
References
“About Altmetric and the Altmetric Attention Score.” Altmetric (21 June 2016). https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000059309-about-altmetric-and-the-altmetric-attention-score
“About QOAM.” QOAM. https://www.qoam.eu/about
“About Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP).” Journal Metrics. https://www.journalmetrics.com/snip.php
“About the Eigenfactor Project.” Eigenfactor.org. http://www.eigenfactor.org/about.php
Alemayehu, Muluken Wubayehu. “Researchers’ Attitude to Using Institutional Repositories: A Case Study of the Oslo University Institutional Repository.” Master’s thesis at Oslo University College, 2010. https://oda.hio.no/jspui/handle/10642/426
Archambault, Éric, Didier Amyot, Philippe Deschamps, Aurore Nicol, Françoise Provencher, Lise Rebout and Guillaume Roberge. “Proportion of Open Access Papers Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals at the European and World Levels—1996–2013.” Science-Metrix (2014). http://science-metrix.com/files/science-metrix/publications/d_1.8_sm_ec_dg-rtd_proportion_oa_1996-2013_v11p.pdf
Archambault, Éric, and Étienne Vignola-Gagné. “The Use of Bibliometrics in the Social Sciences and Humanities.” Science Metrix, 2004. http://www.science-metrix.com/pdf/SM_2004_008_SSHRC_Bibliometrics_Social_Science.pdf
Archambault, Éric, Grégoire Côté, Brooke Struck and Matthieu Voorons. “Research Impact of Paywalled versus Open Access Papers.” OAnumbr. http://www.1science.com/PDF/oaNumber_OACA_3million_paper.pdf
Baker, Monya. “Open-access Index Delists Thousands of Journals.” Nature News. http://www.nature.com/news/open-access-index-delists-thousands-of-journals-1.19871
Baneyx, Audrey. “‘Publish or Perish’ as Citation Metrics Used to Analyze Scientific Output in the Humanities: International Case Studies in Economics, Geography, Social Sciences, Philosophy, and History.” Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis 56, no. 6 (2008): 363-371. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00005-008-0043-0
Barbaro, Anarita, Monica Zedda, Donatella Gentili, and Rafael Leon Greenblatt. “The Presence of High-impact factor Open Access Journals in Science, Technology, Engineering and Medicine (STEM) Disciplines.” Journal of Library and Information Science 6, no. 3 (2015). doi: 10.4403/jlis.it-11257
Beall, Jeffrey. “Beall’s List.” Scholarly Open Access. https://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/
Bohannon, John. “Who’s Afraid of Peer Review?” Science 342, no. 6154 (October 4, 2013): 60–65. doi:10.1126/science.342.6154.60
Bohannon, John. “Who’s Downloading Pirated Papers? Everyone.” Science Magazine, (2016). http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pirated-papers-everyone
Bowley, Chealsye, and Micah Vandegrift. “Librarian, Heal Thyself: A Scholarly Communication Analysis of LIS Journals.” In the Library with the Lead Pipe, (2014): 2-18. http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2014/healthyself/
Carter, Howard, Carolyn A. Snyder, and Andrea Imre. “Library Faculty Publishing and Intellectual Property Issues: A Survey of Attitudes and Awareness.” Libraries and the Academy 7, no. 1 (2007): 65-79. doi:10.1353/pla.2007.0003
Chan, Leslie, Darius Cuplinskas, Michael Eisen, Fred Friend, Yana Genova, Jean-Claude Guedon, Melissa Hagemann, Stevan Harnad, Rick Johnson, Rima Kupryte, Manfredi La Manna, Istvan Rev, Monika Segbert, Sidnei de Souza, Peter Suber, and Jan Velterop. “The Budapest Open Access Initiative Declaration.” BOAI. 2002. http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read
Citron, Daniel T., and Paul Ginsparg. “Patterns of Text Reuse in Scientific Corpus.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, no. 1 (2014): 25-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1415135111
Cornell University Library. “ArXiv.” Cornell University Library. http://arxiv.org/
“The Cost of Knowledge.” http://thecostofknowledge.com/
Covey, Denise Troll. “Recruiting Content for the Institutional Repository: The Barriers Exceed the Benefits.” Journal of Digital Information 12, no. 3 (2011). https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/2068
Crotty, David. “A Quck Tour around the World of Scholarly Journal Publishing.” The Scholarly Kitchen. 18 August 2016. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2016/08/18/a-quick-tour-around-the-world-of-scholarly-journal-publishing/
Dingley, Brenda. “U.S. Periodical Prices – 2005.” ALA, (2005): 1-16. http://www.ala.org/alcts/sites/ala.org.alcts/files/content/resources/collect/serials/ppi/05usppi.pdf
Dolan, Carl. “Feasibility Study: The Evaluation and Benchmarking of Humanities Research in Europe.” HERA. 2007.
English, Ray, and Heather Joseph. “The NIH Mandate: An Open Access Landmark.” College and Research Libraries News 69, no. 2 (2008): 82-85. http://ohio5.openrepository.com/ohio5/handle/11282/309836
Enserink, Martin. “In dramatic statement, European leaders call for ‘immediate’ open access to all scientific papers by 2020.” Science Magazine. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/05/dramatic-statement-european-leaders-call-immediate-open-access-all-scientific-papers
Eve, Martin. “Flawed Sting Operation Singles Out Open Access Journals.” The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/flawed-sting-operation-singles-out-open-access-journals-18846
“Executive Directive on Public Access.” SPARC. 2013. http://sparcopen.org/our-work/2013-executive-directive/
Falagas, M. E., E. I. Pitsouni, G. A. Malietzis, and G. Pappas. “Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and Weaknesses.” The FASEB Journal 22, no. 2 (September 20, 2007): 338–42. doi:10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
“From Ideas to Industries: Human Genome Project.” SPARC. November 19, 2015, http://sparcopen.org/impact-story/human-genome-project/
Garfield, Eugene. “The Agony and the Ecstasy—The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor.” International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, (2005). http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/jifchicago2005.pdf?utm_source=false&utm_medium=false&utm_campaign=false
Garfield, Eugene. “The Thomson Reuters Impact Factor.” Web of Science. 20 June 1994. http://wokinfo.com/essays/impact-factor/
Giampietro, Marina. “Twenty Years of a Free, Open Web.” CERN. 30 April 2013, https://home.cern/about/updates/2013/04/twenty-years-free-open-web
Giglia, Elena. “The Impact Factor of Open Access Journals: Data and Trends.” Rédaction Médicale et Scientifique, (2011): 16-39. http://www.h2mw.eu/redactionmedicale/2011/02/Giglia_IF%20of%20OA%20journals_2010.pdf
Greenberg, Julia. “Editors of the Journal Lingua Protest-Quit in Battle for Open Access.” Wired, https://www.wired.com/2015/11/editors-of-the-journal-lingua-protest-quit-in-battle-for-open-access/
Hansen, David. “Understanding and Making Use of Academic Authors’ Open Access Rights.” Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 1, no. 2: 1-10. http://jlsc-pub.org/articles/10.7710/2162-3309.1050/galley/68/download/
“How Open Is It?” PLoS. 2014. https://www.plos.org/files/HowOpenIsIt_English.pdf
“Incentives, Integration, and Mediation: Sustainable Practices for Populating Repositories.” Confederation of Open Access Repositories (COAR). June 2013. https://www.coar-repositories.org/fr/activities/repository-content/sustainable-practices-for-populating-repositories-report/
Jacsó, Péter. “Google Scholar: The Pros and the Cons.” Online Information Review 29, no. 2 (April 2005): 208–14. doi:10.1108/14684520510598066
Joseph, Heather. “Supporting the Vice-President’s Cancer Moonshot Initiative.” SPARC Open Access News. June 6, 2016. http://sparcopen.org/news/2016/supporting-the-vps-cancer-moonshot/
Kaiser, Jocyln. “What Vice President Biden’s Moonshot May Mean for Cancer Research.” Science. January 2016. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/01/what-vice-president-biden-s-moonshot-may-mean-cancer-research
Larivière, Vincent, Véronique Kiermer, Catriona J. MacCallum, Marcia McNutt, Mark Patterson, Bernd Pulverer, Sowmya Swaminathan, Stuart Taylor, and Stephen Curry. “A Simple Proposal for the Publication of Journal Citation Distributions.” Publication of Journal Citations, (2016): 2-24. http://biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2016/07/05/062109.full.pdf
Nassi-Calò, Lilian. “Open Access Reviewed: Stricter Criteria Preserve Credibility.” SciELO in Perspective. http://blog.scielo.org/en/2016/05/25/open-access-reviewed-stricter-criteria-preserve-credibility/#.WAD8X_krLmE
“NIH Manuscript Collection Optimized for Text-Mining and More.” Extramural Nexus. 16 November 2015. https://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2015/11/16/nih-manuscript-collection-optimized-for-text-mining-and-more/
O’Luanaigh, Cian. “World Wide Web born at CERN 25 years ago.” CERN. 8 April 2014. https://home.cern/about/updates/2014/03/world-wide-web-born-cern-25-years-ago
Ochsner, Michael, Sven E. Hug, and Hans-Dieter Daniel. “Indicators for Research Quality in the Humanities: Opportunities and Limitations.” Bibliometrie-Praxis Und Forschung 1, (2012). http://www.bibliometrie-pf.de/index.php/bibliometrie/article/view/157/192
Peek, Robin. “Harvard Faculty Mandates OA.” Information Today, (2008). https://www.questia.com/magazine/1G1-177673457/harvard-faculty-mandates-oa
Peters, Paul. “2009: A Year of Strong Growth for Hindawi.” SPARC-OAForum, (2010). http://mx2.arl.org/lists/sparc-oaforum/message/5326.html
PLoS Medicine Editors. “The Impact Factor Game.” PLoS Medicine 3, no. 6 (2006): 291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291.
Rodriguez, Juliea. “Awareness and Attitudes about Open Access Publishing: A Glance at Generational Differences.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 40, (2014): 604-610. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133314001852
Roemer, Robin Chin, and Rachel Borchardt. Meaningful Metrics: A 21st-Century Librarian’s Guide to Bibliometrics, Altmetrics, and Research Impact. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2015.
“San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment: Putting Science into the Assessment of Research.” DORA. December 2012, http://www.ascb.org/files/SFDeclarationFINAL.pdf?910290
“San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment.” DORA. http://www.ascb.org/dora/
Sheehan, Jerry. “Increasing Access to Results of Federally Funded Science.” The White House. 22 February 2016. https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2016/02/22/increasing-access-results-federally-funded-science
Shen, Cenyu, and Bo-Christer Bjork. “‘Predatory’ Open Access: A Longitudinal Study of Article Volumes and Market Characteristics.” BMC Medicine 15, no. 13 (2015), doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2
SPARC Europe. “The Open Access Citation Advantage: List of Studies and Results to Date.” OACA. http://sparceurope.org/oaca_table/.
Steele, Colin, Linda Butler, and Danny Kingsley. “The Publishing Imperative: The Pervasive Influence of Publication Metrics.” Learned Publishing 19, no. 4 (2006): 277-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/095315106778690751.
Suber, Peter. “Gratis and Libre Open Access.” SPARC Open Access Newsletter. August 2008. http://sparcopen.org/our-work/gratis-and-libre-open-access/
Suber, Peter. “Open Access Overview.” Earlham College. 15 December 2015, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm
Suber, Peter. “Springer to Acquire BioMed Central Group.” SPARC-OAForum, (2008). http://mx2.arl.org/lists/sparc-oaforum/message/4605.html
Suber, Peter. Open Access. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2012.
“Sustainable Best Practices for Populating Repositories: Preliminary Report.” Confederation of Open Access Repositories (COAR). May 2012. https://www.coar-repositories.org/files/Sustainiable-practices-preliminary-results_final.pdf
Swan, Alma. “The Open Access Citation Advantage: Studies and Results to Date.” SPARC Europe, 1-17. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/268516/2/Citation_advantage_paper.pdf.
Tennant, Jonathan P., François Waldner, Damien C. Jacques, Paola Masuzzo, Lauren B. Collister, and Chris. H. J. Hartgerink. “The Academic, Economic and Societal Impacts of Open Access: An Evidence-Based Review.” F1000Research 5, (2016): 632. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8460.2
Travis, John. “In Survey, Most Give Thumbs-up to Pirated Papers.” Science Magazine, (2016). http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/05/survey-most-give-thumbs-pirated-papers
Wagner, A. Ben. “Open Access Citation Advantage: An Annotated Bibliography.” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 60, (2010). doi: 10.5062/F4Q81B0W
Wang, Xianwen, Chen Liu, Wenli Mao, and Zhichao Fang. “The Open Access Advantage Considering Citation, Article Usage and Social Media Attention.” Scientometrics 103, no. 2 (2015): 555-564. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0
Whitfield, John. “Open Access Comes of Age.” Nature News 474, no. 428 (2011). doi:10.1038/474428a
Willinsky, John. “Open Access and Academic Reputation.” Annals of Library and Information Studies 57, no. 3: 296-302. http://14.139.47.15/handle/123456789/10242.
Xia, Jingfeng. “A longitudinal Study of Scholars Attitudes and Behaviors toward Open-access Journal Publishing.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61, no. 3 (2010): 615-624. https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-76649109885&origin=inward&txGid=0
Yang, Zheng, and Yu Li. “University Faculty Awareness and Attitudes towards Open Access Publishing and the Institutional Repository: A Case Study.” Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 3, no. 1 (May 6, 2015). doi:10.7710/2162-3309.1210.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Librarian: The Journal of Theory and Practice of Librarianship
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.